ArticleViewAbstractPharmacognosy Journal,2024,16,6,1373-1378.DOI:10.5530/pj.2024.16.221Published:January 2025Type:Research ArticleNatural Compounds in Clot Waveform Analysis and D-Dimer Modulation: Implications for COVID-19 Diagnosis and PrognosisPrafa Alif Rahmawan, and Yetti Hernaningsih Prafa Alif Rahmawan1, Yetti Hernaningsih2,3* 1Student of Specialist, Clinical Pathology Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, INDONESIA. 2Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, INDONESIA. 3Department of Clinical Pathology, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, INDONESIA. Abstract:Objectives: Patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may develop hypercoagulopathy. A thromboelastogram can detect hypercoagulopathy, but it is not commonly available in all healthcare facilities. Understanding the clot waveform analysis (CWA) parameters of the CS-2500 coagulation analyzer in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may help determine whether it can serve as an alternative. Methods: This study measured the amounts of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based CWA, aPTT, plasma prothrombin time (PPT), and D-dimer using the CS-2500 autoanalyzer in 177 patients confirmed with COVID-19 and 110 patients without COVID-19. Retrospective data collection was conducted using electronic medical records. COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 were distinguished by the SARS-COV-2 PCR results. Results: Substantial differences were observed in the aPTT-based CWA parameters, including maximum coagulation velocity (Vmax), maximum coagulation acceleration (Amax), and maximum coagulation deceleration (Dmax) (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.02), between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups but not between survivors and non-survivors. Additionally, a substantial difference was identified in the D-dimer between the two groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). The difference in D-dimer between both groups could be explained by the fact that non-survivors have a more prominent hypercoagulable state. Conclusions: While the D-dimer may be a better indicator of mortality in COVID-19 patients, the aPTT-based CWA characteristics may be more helpful in differentiating between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. Further investigations on treatment interference and the specificity of this method to predict hypercoagulable states are warranted. Keywords:Activated partial thromboplastin time, Clot waveform analysis, COVID-19, D-dimerView:PDF (436.2 KB) PDF Images Boxplot values of (A) D-dimer, (B) Vmax CWA, (C) Amax CWA, and (D) Dmax CWA in the survivor and non-survivor groups. The box displays the interquartile range and median values, while the upper and lower lines represent the minimum and maximum values. ‹ Natural Cartilage-Derived Scaffolds for 3D Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture: Promoting Chondrogenesis and Modulating Secretome Composition up Visual Mapping and Future Direction of Marine Products Supplementary and Chemotherapy in The Treatment of Breast Cancer. A Bibliometric ›